An Expanded Manifesto by Lefteris Heretakis
Introduction
We are living through a time of breathtaking acceleration. Generative systems now compose images, invent typefaces, and arrange layouts in the blink of an eye. Predictive engines complete our sentences, pre-empt our searches, and even simulate taste. Yet the more we allow such systems to anticipate our intentions, the more we risk losing the human depth that makes design meaningful. Institutions, seduced by speed and efficiency, increasingly measure creativity by throughput, novelty metrics, and visual polish. The result is a generation fluent in tools but uncertain in judgement, capable of producing but not always of discerning. The corrective is craft.
The Meaning of Craft
Craft is not nostalgia. It is not a sentimental retreat into ink and paper, nor a rejection of technology. Craft, as I define it, is a cultivated form of intelligence, an education of the senses. It is the trained eye that perceives proportion and rhythm in an instant, the hand that feels the tension between precision and expression, the mind that accepts repetition as a route to mastery.
Craft is a way of thinking. It is iterative, reflective, ethical. It invites the maker into a dialogue with materials, tools, and context. It demands time, humility, and care, the same virtues John Ruskin saw as the foundations of good work, and which William Morris believed to be inseparable from a just society. To practice craft is to slow down enough to see clearly; to understand that judgement is not something to be automated but to be cultivated.
Why Craft Matters Now
When machines can imitate solutions instantly, the human advantage lies in meaning. The designer’s task is not to compete with the algorithm in speed or output, but to bring depth, empathy, and cultural intelligence to the work. An AI system can generate a thousand posters, but it cannot know which one carries emotional weight or ethical responsibility.
David Pye once distinguished between the “workmanship of certainty” and the “workmanship of risk.” The latter, the willingness to test, to fail, to feel one’s way forward, is where human creativity lives. In the age of automation, it is also where education must return. Craft turns speed into responsibility, and productivity into purpose.
Practice over Performance
Too often, contemporary design education rewards polish over process. Students are trained to produce neat final pieces rather than to develop judgement through trial and error. Yet it is through the rough sketches, the false starts, and the revisions that true understanding is formed.
Craft insists that we record and value these traces. Portfolios should show not just what students made, but how they thought, their hesitations, refinements, and discoveries. Margaret McMillan’s belief that imagination must be exercised through making remains vital here: children, and by extension students, learn not by watching perfection, but by wrestling with imperfection. Education must therefore be reoriented from performance to practice, from spectacle to substance.
Ethics and Vocation
To teach craft is to teach care. A student who learns to refine a line until it sings, or to test a design until it serves its audience well, is also learning an ethic of responsibility. Ethical design is not a module or a slogan; it grows from habits of attention, checking, questioning, seeking critique.
John Taylor Gatto argued that real education should lead to self-mastery and purpose. Craft fosters exactly that. It forms practitioners who understand that their choices have weight, that every pixel, poster, or publication affects real people. In this sense, craft is not only professional but moral: it calls the designer to serve society, to contribute beauty and clarity rather than noise.
Integrating Craft and Digital Fluency
This manifesto is not a call to reject the digital. The tools of the AI age are powerful allies when used with discernment. What matters is how they are used, and who is guiding them. A wise curriculum allows students to move between the tactile and the virtual, from charcoal to code, from collage to computation, so that sensitivity developed in one domain enriches the other.
The hand trains the eye; the screen extends the imagination. The aim is to produce designers who can dialogue with technology, not depend upon it. As Marshall McLuhan reminded us, “we shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.” Craft ensures that this shaping remains conscious, reflective, and humane.
Assessment for Depth
If we wish to value craft, our assessment systems must evolve. Grades based on surface outcomes encourage performance; depth-based evaluation rewards growth. Students should be assessed on annotated journals, iterative records, peer critiques, and reflective statements that reveal the reasoning behind their decisions.
Such evidence resists the tyranny of the “final piece.” It recognises that the process, the path from uncertainty to insight, is the true education. As Ruskin wrote, “The highest reward for a man’s toil is not what he gets for it, but what he becomes by it.”
A Call to Action
Teachers must reclaim their role as cultivators of judgement. Their task is not to curate portfolios but to form thinkers.
Institutions must fund slow learning, studios where students can experiment without fear of failure.
Funders must invest not only in equipment but in discernment, in programmes that develop attention, reflection, and ethical capacity.
These are not romantic ideals but pragmatic necessities. A world governed by automation needs human beings capable of care, restraint, and wisdom.
Conclusion
Craft is not a relic of the past; it is the pedagogy of the future. It is how we train discernment in an age of abundance, how we teach designers to see rather than merely to generate. It reminds us that true creativity is not in the tool but in the mind that wields it, and that education’s task is to cultivate that mind with patience, integrity, and imagination.
In reclaiming craft, we do not turn back the clock, we turn it forward with greater care. For in the AI age, our greatest challenge is not to make more, but to make well.
References
Gatto, John Taylor. Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1992.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
McMillan, Margaret. Education Through the Imagination. London: Allen & Unwin, 1929.
Morris, William. Hopes and Fears for Art. London: Ellis & White, 1882.
Pye, David. The Nature and Art of Workmanship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
Ruskin, John. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. London: Smith, Elder and Co., 1849.
Ruskin, John. The Stones of Venice. London: Smith, Elder and Co., 1851–1853.
💛 Love what we do at The New Art School & Design Education Talks podcast? Help keep design education alive!
✨ Join our mailing list: https://sendfox.com/thenewartschool
Explore more: https://linktr.ee/thenewartschool | @newartschool| https://newartschool.education/ | https://heretakis.medium.com/ | https://odysee.com/@thenewartschool:c
The New Art School 